Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMarin Lopez, Jose R.
dc.contributor.authorDominguez Ruiz, Franklin J.
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-17T03:07:59Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-22T12:11:29Z
dc.date.available2020-08-17T03:07:59Z
dc.date.available2022-02-22T12:11:29Z
dc.date.issued2020-07
dc.identifier.isbn978-958-52071-4-1
dc.identifier.issn2414-6390
dc.identifier.otherhttp://laccei.org/LACCEI2020-VirtualEdition/meta/FP253.html
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2020.1.1.253
dc.identifier.urihttp://axces.info/handle/10.18687/20200101_253
dc.description.abstractAbstract– Influence of two roll control systems, one passive and another active, are compared in a 49-m length overall mono- hull ship in beam waves. For this objective, time integrations of the uncoupled ship roll response differential equation considering nonlinear behavior of righting arm and damping moments, are developed; fourth-order Runge-Kutta algorithm with constant time interval is employed. These numerical simulations are performed with the original naked hull, then including the effect of bilge keels, and, finally with bilge keel and an active foil control system. The righting arm is interpolated from the original values with a 7 th order polynomial. Damping moment is calculated for different amplitudes and cubically interpolated as a function of roll velocity. Excitation moment from irregular waves is applied at sea states 2, 3 and 4, considering a combination of 1000 harmonic components. To estimate the moment due to the active foil control, typical values for the constants of the transfer function are employed, based on its natural frequencies. Wind moment is estimated with sea state mean velocity and lateral projected area of the ship. With the time registers, spectral densities of roll angle and roll acceleration are calculated using Fourier transforms, and finally, RMS values are estimated from area under those curves. A comparison shows the reduction in roll angle and roll acceleration when the 17-m 2 bilge keels are installed, and when the 6-m 2 active fins are acting.en_US
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherLACCEI Inc.en_US
dc.rightsLACCEI License
dc.rights.urihttps://laccei.org/blog/copyright-laccei-papers/
dc.subjectroll stabilizationen_US
dc.subjectbilge keelen_US
dc.subjectactive foil controlen_US
dc.titleComparison of different roll motion controls for a 49-m mono-hull passenger ship in beam waves
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.countryEcuadoren
dc.description.institutionEscuela Superior Politecnica del Litoralen
dc.description.trackEngineering Design, Engineering Materials and Engineering Innovationen
dc.journal.referatopeerReview


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • 2020 LACCEI - Virtual Edition
    The Eighteen LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology.

Show simple item record